Interpretation integrity audit protocol
Purpose
This protocol defines a reproducible method for producing an opposable audit report that characterizes divergence between a declared corpus snapshot, machine-generated interpretations, and a verifiable evidence chain.
It does not introduce new norms. It operationalizes existing interpretive governance constraints by requiring traceability and legitimate non-response when verification is not possible.
Informative label (fr-CA): Audit d’intégrité interprétative.
Governed by
R3, Anti-faux audit, Anti-identity inference.
Output artifact
Validity
Audit validity is conditional on the stability of audit variables (snapshot hash, boundary, QuerySet version, model identity, and declared run parameters). If a variable changes, the audit must be refreshed.
Non-objectives
- No certification or compliance claim
- No legal advice
- No ranking of systems
- No SEO performance guarantee
Public projection notice: in case of divergence, the canonical Markdown in the manifest prevails.